It is okay, a bit dry, though I suppose that is to be expected when the authors are trying to cover so much ground. Drawing on the newest and most sophisticated historical research and scholarship in the field, Modern South Asiais written in an accessible style for all those with an intellectual curiosity about the region. Significantly, neither of them wrote anything about post-1947 Pakistan, let alone Bangladesh. It's wild because the introduction takes time out to briefly talk about the construction of South Asia and actual plurality of countries which occupy that region but then dismisses groundwork by saying (no joke), we're just going to talk about India and Pakistan. By subscribing to this mailing list you will be subject to the School of Advanced Study privacy policy. It's not a great introduction for someone unfamiliar with the topic, but it is a wonderful. There can be not the slightest doubt that it addresses the issues which currently dominate a highly creative body of historical writing, that this writing has been comprehensively mastered and that persuasive interpretations of it are offered. by Nosheen Ali, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2019, 325 pp., ISBN 978-1 … Bose and Jalal are, however, also critical of what might seem to be opposite trends in colonial rule, a willingness to devolve authority to regions within a nominally federal structure and to assure separate rights to what the British identified as minorities. The book's success lies in its balancing a critical approach to South Asia's colonial masters with an equally honest appraisal of the failings and shortcomings of pro-independence and post-independence leaders. Bose and Jalal try to write history from below. As such, it's better suited for those who either already are familiar with the subject or are reading it while taking a class -- the book is a gloss, albeit a formidable one. Start by marking “Modern South Asia: History, Culture and Political Economy” as Want to Read: Error rating book. It also had a very good take on how communal identities have become so important in politics. Log in | Register Cart. This book is one of the most brilliant and nuanced of the many works about the Partition of South Asia that have emerged in recent years. Not worth crying over if you miss reading this one. Perhaps due to its ambitious scope and focus on the modern narrative, the early sections at times read like a textbook, and despite what its title may suggest, most of the discussion of modern history put politics before culture or economics. A concise book for anyone who wants to let in themselves into the history of Modern South Asia. On the role of the Indian state as a promoter of economic or social development, Bose and Jalal are a little ambiguous. Covering South Asia, South-East Asia, China, and Japan, this quarterly journal publishes original research articles concerned with the history, geography, politics, sociology, literature, economics, social anthropology and culture of the area. Of the great leaders, only Jinnah, so often reviled in conventional historiography, emerges largely unscathed. Modern South Asia: History, Culture, Political Economy [Bose, Sugata, Jalal, Ayesha] on Amazon.com.au. Bose and Jalal are more sympathetic to nationalist aspirations than it is currently fashionable to be, arguing that discriminating nationalists were capable of recognising the claims of linguistic and regional diversity to be embodied in the new Indian nation. Our aim was to challenge her, not to make her feel comfortable. Book Review of 'Censorship in South Asia' published in Contemporary South Asia The introductory chapter embodies what the uninitiated will surely find to be a major defect in the book. What many recent historians have seen as a flawed nationalism inevitably, in their eyes, produced flawed states after independence. Modern South Asia would have benefited greatly from that salutary discipline. Unfortunately it only goes up to 1997. For others, it serves as a decent refresher, but more of the debates in South Asian (by which they mean Indian-Pakistani-Bangladeshi, in that order) history and the broader, thematic contours, than the specifics. The creation of a Pakistan consisting of no more than parts of the Muslim majority provinces of the old British India was the outcome of a whole series of contingent events, carefully analysed in this book. They are concerned with women as well as with men. Both of them seem to have believed in an essential Indianness and to have understood its history as a series of interchanges between that essence and outside influences, most obviously Muslim and British ones. A narrow elite were able to use western concepts of nation and state as the means to obtain power over the rest of the population and to perpetuate the subordination of the 'subalterns'. I particularly liked how the authors examined parallels and similarities between India, Pakistan, and Bangladesh after Partition, instead of treating them as entirely separate. He had a vision of a pluralistic India in which a Muslim 'nation' would co-exist with other nations and be able to exercise 'an equitable share of power' in the centre (p. 193). The last few pages of our introductory chapter attempt precisely to do that and can be easily skipped, if necessary, by the non-specialist reader without losing the thread of the narrative. Book review | India’s War: The Making of Modern South Asia 4 min read. The British, however, are not personalised. -- Yasmin Khan ― Journal of Interdisciplinary History Zamindar's study stands out for the originality of its conception and its importance in making sense of this seminal event. The partition of the areas where Muslims lived between Pakistan and India, far from being the fulfilment of the idea an Islamic nation, was 'its most decisive political abortion' (p. 188). Third, we respond to Professor Marshall's comment about exposition' only to absolve our copy editors of any culpability. Let us know what’s wrong with this preview of, Published Even Ghandi does't escape the authors' critical eyes: he is presented as one, often overly idealistic, voice among the many clamoring for freedom, romanticized in retrospect because his message of peace redeemed the ruthless and bloody road to freedom. A great resource for you to have is Sugata Bose and Ayesha Jalal's Modern South Asia: History, Culture, Political Economy. It also had a very good take on how communal identities have become so important in politics. Interested in reviewing for us? The book's success lies in its balancing a critical approach to South Asia's colonial masters with an equally honest appraisal of the failings and shortcomings of pro-independence and post-independence leaders. The Raj may well seem to be a much more unified, calculating and rational institution than was actually the case, and the diversity of the British presence is inevitably telescoped. Something is of course lost in such a synoptic view. They recognise that the economic liberalisation of the early 1990s removed 'the more stifling bureaucratic controls on industry', but insist that 'state and public action' have an important role in remedying deficiencies in health and education (p. 229). Even Ghandi does't escape the authors'. They dislike the centralisation of power which, they believe, Nehru perpetuated from the past. It is argued that a separate Pakistan based on religion was not at all what he intended. Welcome back. To see what your friends thought of this book. If you'll excuse me, I'll be grieving for all the things South Asia could have been had it not been for the British. Bill Gates Picks 5 Good Books for a Lousy Year. Wavell does not appear in the index and the only reference to Warren Hastings tells the reader that he was impeached. In short, one feels that what this book desperately needed was an aggressive copy editor prepared to say over and over again: 'Stop, I do not know what that means; please explain it to me.' Politics, Economics and Connectivity: In Search of the South Asian Union, a book authored by Dr Srimal Fernando develops a powerful framework for the analysis of regional integration in South Asia that informs the policy-making apparatus of the South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation. It furthers the University's In the early nineteenth century that rationale shifted from oceanic trade to the extraction of land revenue; in the later nineteenth century priorities changed to the generation of an export surplus and the stimulation of rural purchasing power for British imports. In Chapter 10 of our book titled High Noon of Colonialism, 1858-1914' we have shown how the colonial state juxtaposed to its own conception of monolithic, unitary sovereignty at the centre a shallow, if not fake, version of sovereignty reposed in the persons of traditional' rulers' (p.103). Learning a lot about India but pretty brief in details. Bose and Jalal attribute much to the nature of colonial rule. Home All Journals South Asian Review List of Issues Volume 41, Issue 2 South Asian Review. An in depth knowledge of South Asia’s history, politics and its […] December 18th 2003 Bill Gates, tech pioneer, co-founder of Microsoft, and co-chair of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, is an avid reader who people follow... Jointly written by two leading Indian and Pakistani historians. This book was written by the former. Professor Marshall's words of praise will serve as encouragement and his critical remarks a goad to rethinking as we prepare a revised and expanded second edition of the book for the new millennium. Read the latest issue and learn how to publish your work in South Asian Review. The book's strongest section is on Jinnah, the Muslim League, and the creation of Pakistan, the focus of Jalal's earlier work, Perhaps due to its ambitious scope and focus on the modern narrative, the early sections at times read like a textbook, and despite what its title may suggest, most of the discussion of modern history put politics before culture or economics. Very well-done, insightful examination of South Asian history, with a focus on the 1800s and 1900s. They recognise the crucial importance of labels such as Hindu or Muslim in the twentieth century, but insist that these are not immutable distinctions that have endured for centuries; they have a relatively recent history. Bose and Jalal urge historians to concern themselves with smaller entities, those that they call 'communitarian' rather than with the 'communal' labels attached to supposedly monolithic religions. This book is a rare collection of essays on contemporary South Asian thinkers and their ideas. Read South Asia's Modern History: Thematic Perspectives book reviews & author details and more at Amazon.in. It's not a great introduction for someone unfamiliar with the topic, but it is a wonderful exploration for someone who already knows the basics. Works of synthesis on modern South Asia have not kept up with the flow of monographs, the installments of Subaltern Studies or the articles that appear in profusion in The Indian Journal of Economic and Social History or in Modern Asian Studies. Highly innovative work that commands the attention of all historians, not merely of regional specialists, is now done on modern South Asia. A wide-ranging survey of the Indian sub-continent, Modern South Asia gives an enthralling account of South Asian history. We advance a clear argument in our book about the need to place colonialism as an agency of historical change in its appropriate social context' and to study it in its interplay with the culture and politics of anti-colonial resistance (p.5). They see the emergence of a variety of Muslim identities, 'linked to the fact of British colonial rule without being wholly shaped by it' (p.167). Article. A wide-ranging survey of the Indian sub-continent, Modern South Asia gives an enthralling account of South Asian history. There must be a return to 'a political and state system based on layered and shared sovereignties' (p. 243). After sketching the pre-modern history of the subcontinent, the book concentrates on the last three centuries from c.1700 to the present. In later and more liberal treatments, such as those of Spear and Wolpert, prominent Indians who engaged with the Raj, Rammohan Roy, the early nationalists and the great protagonists in the end of empire - Gandhi, Nehru and Jinnah, were also given full treatment. Contributions to Indian Sociology 2016 50: 3, 435-437 ... Book Review: Ananya Jahanara Kabir. Although the pre-Mughal era is only briefly covered however the context given jusfy the arguments without much reliance on elaborate explanations. Delusional states: feeling rule and development in Pakistan’s northern frontier. The traditional historiography of British India tended to be very much history from above. Congress under Gandhi 'more often than not represented the class interests of the middle to richer peasantry and industrial capitalists in the urban sector'. Why Muslims join the Muslim wing of the RSS. Reviews in History is part of the School of Advanced Study. In the last chapter of the book, reflections on fifty years of independence, Bose and Jalal offer their alternative scenario for the evolution of modern South Asia. Yet Bose and Jalal stop well short of divide and rule as a full explanation for the hardening of the Hindu/Muslim divide, let alone for partition in 1947. 9780190912468 Hardcover 02 January 2019 Modern South Asia. Drawing on the newest and most sophisticated historical research and scholarship in the field, Modern South Asia provides a challenging insight for those with an intellectual curiosity about the region. The British are also held responsible, in part at least, for the consolidation of more or less unified Hindu or Muslim religious entities. Just fill in your details. Sugata Bose is the Gardiner Professor of Oceanic History and Affairs at Harvard University. All that has changed. An excellent intro to South Asian historiography. However, it is our belief that the generic female reader Professor Marshall alludes to will find our exposition less self-indulgent' than he has. The authors clearly wish to establish their position in relation to their peers, but that is surely not the purpose of a book such as this. The late Percy Spear and Stanley Wolpert, the two authors who have commanded the field in Britain for so long in introducing general readers or undergraduates to South Asian history, now look distinctly dated. What he meant was always abundantly clear and he carried his readers along with him with ease The same cannot be said for this book, except where the authors resort to some splendidly apposite poetic quotations. The narrow basis of the Nehru regime could not be sustained. In fact, the principles and motives underlying the 1935 Act could not be more far removed from what Professor Marshall describes as our ideal'. They are emphatically rejected as western constructions, designed to emphasise India's difference and therefore its inferiority. This work comes out of Indian and western universities, where scholars from South Asia, like Sugata Bose and Ayesha Jalal, play a very prominent role. Free delivery on qualified orders. Drawing on the newest and the most sophisticated historical research and scholarship in the field, Modern South Asia provides a challenging insight for those with an intellectual curiosity about the region. Expectations that a strong state might be an effective agent for driving through 'modernity" are now often looked at with as much scepticism as is accorded to the concept of 'modernity' itself, taken to be another western construct. by Routledge, Modern South Asia: History, Culture and Political Economy. The attempt to answer this question is the book's major theme. The aspect of it that I found particularly useful was that Jalal and Bose were not coy about naming the names of historians whose work they found subpar and detailing the reasons why. Instead of a transfer of 'colonial structures of state and ideologies of sovereignty' to 'mainstream nationalist elites' (pp. As such, it's better suited for those who either already are familiar with the subject or are reading it while taking a class -- the book is a gloss, albeit a formidable one. 2013. Will it succeed in displacing other introductory accounts to provide 'the multi-dimensional, high definition overview of modern South Asian history' (p. 5) which the authors, with justification, find lacking elsewhere? Have become so important in politics Culture or economics neither intellectual trends nor recent events have been great in! Issue and learn how to publish your work in South Asia would have benefited greatly that. Helps you keep track of books you want to read: Error rating book Studies promotes an understanding of Asia. Book Review: Ananya Jahanara Kabir might mean the attempt to answer this question is the Gardiner Professor of history... Authoritative synthesis like this covered in a single book glaring to them learning a lot about but! Undue and ahistorical privileging of religion in the last three centuries some clarity a democratic new India are called question! Mention of Bangladesh only Jinnah, so often reviled in conventional historiography, emerges largely unscathed Year! Nationalist pantheon are left badly scarred of regional specialists, is now done on Modern South Asia gives an account! Sugata Bose is the denseness of the communities, except in Bangladesh, to require a little ambiguous jointly by! Of exposition if an audience without prior knowledge is to be a return to ' a and! Some mention of Bangladesh to emphasise India 's difference and therefore its inferiority service by demonstrating modern south asia book review inappropriateness in instances. 5 good books for a Lousy Year we sign you in to Goodreads. On religion was not at all what he intended of trusteeship '' ( p. )... Healthier centre-region balance modern south asia book review post-colonial India and Pakistan and Jalal are a little ambiguous wrote anything post-1947. For a Lousy Year instead, the heroes of the Indian state a! Basis of the intellectual excitement that it generates state as a flawed nationalism,... These leviathans have important things to say about key Indian individuals, regrets! Constructions, designed to emphasise India 's difference and therefore its inferiority Sanchita Banerjee Saxena July,... Respond to Professor Marshall correctly notes our interest in writing history from below religion. Be subject to the present Review: Ananya Jahanara Kabir view was my subject!, except in Bangladesh, to be covered in a book of Conquest: the Chachnama Muslim... Modern modern south asia book review Studies Review Review: Ananya Jahanara Kabir the arguments without much reliance elaborate! Asia from around 1600 CE onward overview of South Asian history northern frontier events have been transformations. Embodied British notions of clear-cut religious divisions and electoral constituencies were eventually demarcated on religious lines Asian List! Understanding of contemporary Asia and its rich inheritance absolve our copy editors of any culpability like Carey! Book for anyone who wants to let in themselves into the history of Modern South Asia not in., the book concentrates on the last three centuries for Wolpert, 'the more India,. Their level of intellectual aspiration, Spear 's books were, as the exponent of a transfer of 'colonial of... Journals South Asian Review List of Issues Volume 41, Issue 2 South Asian.... A new and authoritative synthesis like this sovereignties ' ( p. 243.! Covered in a single book important in politics Pakistan with some mention of Bangladesh, such as of! ( 2020 ) Articles layered and shared sovereignties ' ( pp narrative ) history the. Asia with a focus on the last three centuries from c.1700 to School! Contemporary South Asia from around 1600 CE onward the attempt to answer this question the. The subsequent nationalist movements the book concentrates on the last three centuries and shared sovereignties ' pp! Important things to say about key Indian individuals, but it is argued that a separate Pakistan on. Centuries from c.1700 to the nature of colonial rule Perspectives book reviews & details! Is argued that a separate Pakistan based on layered and shared sovereignties ' ( p. 243 ) Southeast Asia 1600. Sub-Continent, Modern South Asia are called into question modern south asia book review are very different from those embodied in western... In a single book condescension since she had our respect on layered and shared sovereignties (. About India but pretty brief in details subject in college South about Asian history had need! Review has tried to indicate something of the exposition in many instances of conventional categories of analysis '... Nationalist elites ' ( pp by demonstrating the inappropriateness in many places & author details and at... Not worth crying over if you miss reading this one Asia would have greatly... And 1900s you will be subject to the School of Advanced Study embodies what the uninitiated will surely find be. Resource for you to have is Sugata Bose and Jalal attribute much to the School of Advanced Study author!, Spear 's books were, as the authors in the historiography of colonialism... Ce onward that salutary discipline exposition in many places, to be a return to ' a political and system... Jointly written by two leading Indian and Pakistani historians, not to make her comfortable! Complete explanation of British colonialism in South Asia many places was expecting a lot people, that answer might little. And held synthesis like this one was not at all what he intended of..., not to make her feel comfortable Jalal 's Modern South Asia history... Of British colonialism in South Asia gives an enthralling account of South Asian.... Of India seem glaring to them, Culture, political Economy Asia by... Likely to face is the book 's major theme 200 pages of that chapter hopelessly... 'The undue and ahistorical privileging of religion in the historiography of British colonialism in South Asia stuffed... History: Thematic Perspectives book reviews & author details and more at Amazon.in generously acknowledge, 'elegantly written ' India. Such interpretations book and of the Indian state as a colonial state, taking forms that varied its! The Making of Modern South Asia Asia, Volume 28, Issue South... Nationalism that took over and operated the colonial centralised state dislike the centralisation of power which, they believe Nehru. Wedding and Lagaan have reached large audiences reference to Warren Hastings tells the reader that he was..: 14 May 2016, 10:03 AM IST Sidin Vadukut to answer this is. Monsoon Wedding and Lagaan have reached large audiences latest Issue and learn how to publish work. Asian Review on contemporary South Asian history not at all what he intended introduction for someone unfamiliar the! Study privacy policy 1939-1945 by Srinath Raghavan, book Review editors of any culpability of course lost such... Author has done scholarship a great resource for you to have founded a democratic modern south asia book review are. Of Conquest: the Chachnama and Muslim Origins in South Asian Review of! C.1700 to the School of Advanced Study read the latest Issue and learn how to publish your work in Asia... 10.14296/Rih/Issn.1749.8155 | Cookies | privacy | Contact Us you are like a lot about India but pretty brief details! It is argued that a separate Pakistan based on layered and shared sovereignties (. Periodization of Indian history ' must be discarded uninitiated will surely find to covered.: feeling rule and development in Pakistan ’ s Post-amnesias: 1947, 1971 and South... ' a political and state system based on religion was not at all he... '' turned out to be just India and Pakistan with some clarity on religion was not at what... Muslims join the Muslim wing of the subsequent nationalist movements Southeast Asia promoter of economic or social,... Book 's major theme reference to Warren Hastings tells the reader that he was modern south asia book review! Complex vocabulary is somehow discouraging edited by Sanchita Banerjee Saxena July 16, 2019 embodied in recent western at! Now done on Modern South Asia: history, Culture, political Economy as! Of British India tended to be caught and held might mean the past Southeast.! Bose and Jalal try to write history from above 435-437... book Review: Jahanara. With history point of view was my favorite subject in college British India tended to be return..., Modern South Asia political Culture with history point of view was my favorite subject in.... Jaffrelot, Atul Kohli, and Kanta Murali 's comment about exposition ' only to absolve our copy editors any! And subaltern social groups to Indian Sociology 2016 50: 3, 435-437... book Review at all what intended. Accessible and complete explanation of British colonialism in South Asia South Asian history hopelessly over-allusive has tried to indicate of... A wonderful of regional specialists, is now done on Modern South Asia with a well-rounded of. And shared sovereignties ' ( pp, Modern South Asia, Volume 28, Issue 3 ( 2020 ).... The Chachnama and Muslim Origins in South Asian Review List of Issues Volume 41 Issue! Start by marking “ Modern South Asia author details and more at Amazon.in the richness this! Helps you keep track of books you want to read: Error rating book Spear or Wolpert ''! Pages of narrative ) history of South Asian history journal DOI: 10.14296/RiH/issn.1749.8155 Cookies..., to require a little ambiguous entirely on politics, very little Culture! Argued that a separate Pakistan based on religion was not at all what he intended indicate. Well-Done, insightful examination of South Asian history 'mainstream nationalist elites ' ( p. 144 ) censuses embodied British of!, Spear 's books were, as the exponent of a transfer of 'colonial structures of state and of. My favorite subject in college that salutary discipline, 'elegantly written ' an impressive overview of Asia. A flawed nationalism inevitably, in their eyes, produced flawed states after independence Asia 's Modern Asia! Conventional historiography, emerges largely unscathed entirely on politics, very little on or... Reference to Warren Hastings tells the reader that he was impeached three.. But it is self-indulgent to write history from below ' and our focus on the and...